讲座题目：道德权威的崩溃与教化国家的终结：
毛泽东时代的中国与乔治·W·布什执政下的美国两个案例的比较
Collapse of Moral Authority and the End of the Civilizer State:
Comparing Two Cases --- Mao’s China and George W. Bush’s United States
主讲人：澳大利亚国立大学Peter Van Ness 教授
主持人：莫凯歌博士
时 间：2012年10月9日下午4点
地 点：浙江大学玉泉校区公共管理学院612室（外经贸楼）
讲座内容提要：道德权威对于大国的外交政策具有重要的影响力。国家可以利用道德权威的力量来教化他国，从而获得外交影响力。冷战时期，道德权威在一国的外交政策中有时与物质力量一样起着极为重要的作用。尽管存在着完全不同的文化传统与政治历史，中国与美国在不同历史阶段上都扮演过“教化国家”的角色。历史上，占主导地位的国家利用道德权威教化他国的例子也比比皆是。然而，有迹象表明，教化他国在当今世界主要大国外交政策中地位已越来越小。当大国之间的竞争不再是关于善恶对错的意识形态竞争时，大国之间的关系也随之改变。一个不存在“教化国家”的全球化世界将会带来一个新的国际关系局面。
主讲人简介：
Peter Van Ness, PhD (Berkeley)
Professor, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University
Member, Editorial Board, Critical Asian Studies; Member, Editorial Advisory Board of both Journal of Contemporary China and Asian Perspective; faculty member, Graduate School of International Studies, University of Denver (1966–1998); visiting appointments at ANU, University of Michigan, University of Tokyo, Keio University, and Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Research Interests
Chinese foreign policy, Sino-American relations, human rights, and Asia-Pacific security.
Key Publications
‘Building Security in Space: A Brief Introduction’, Asian Perspective, 35(4) 2011: 497–501.
Guest editor, special issue on ‘Avoiding an Arms Race in Space’, Asian Perspective, 35(4) 2011.
‘The Time Has Come for a Treaty to Ban Weapons in Space’, Asian Perspective, 34(3) 2010: 215–25.
‘Japan, the Indispensable Power in Northeast Asia’, Global Asia, 4(4) 2010.
‘The Problem with George: US Hegemony in Disarray’, Global Asia, 4(1) 2009: 48–51.
‘Designing a Mechanism for Multilateral Security Cooperation in Northeast Asia’, Asian Perspective, 32(4) 2008: 107–26.
‘Debating China’s Future’, China Security, 4(3) 2008: 24–6.
‘Australia and Regional Cooperation in Northeast Asia: From Hegemony to a Multilateral Security Mechanism?’ Austral Policy Forum 07-11A, 17 May 2007
‘The United States, China, and Japan – and the Future of East Asia’ [in Japanese], in SPIRIT Institute (ed.), Higashi Ajia ni ‘Kyodotai’ ha dekiru ka (Tokyo: Shakai Hyoron sha, 2006).
‘Bush’s Search for Absolute Security and the Rise of China’, in Mark Beeson (ed.), Bush and Asia: America’s Evolving Relations with East Asia (London: Routledge, 2006).
(ed. with Mel Gurtov), Confronting the Bush Doctrine: Critical Views from the Asia-Pacific (London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2005).
‘China’s Response to the Bush Doctine’, World Policy Journal, 21(4) 2004/05: 38–47.
‘The North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Four-Plus-Two – An Idea Whose Time Has Come’, Keynotes 04 (Canberra: Department of International Relations, RSPAS, ANU, 2003).
‘Hegemony, Not Anarchy: Why China and Japan Are Not Balancing US Unipolar Power’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2(1) 2002; also published as Working Paper 2001/4 (Canberra: Department of International Relations, RSPAS, ANU, 2001).
(ed.), Debating Human Rights: Critical Essays form the United States and Asia (New York: Routledge, 1999).
‘Addressing the Human Rights Issue in Sino-American Relations’, Journal of International Affairs, 49(2) 1996.
‘China as a Third World State: Foreign Policy and Official National Identity’, in Lowell Dittmer and Samuel S. Kim (eds), China’s Quest for National Identity (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993).
(ed.), Market Reforms in Socialist Societies (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1989).
Revolution and Chinese Foreign Policy: Peking’s Support for Wars of National Liberation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970).
欢迎广大师生参加。
浙江大学公共管理学院政治学系
2012-10-07